Asset recovery investigations in Ukraine are designed to identify, trace, document, and help locate assets connected with fraud, corruption, financial misconduct, commercial disputes, criminal activity, or other unlawful conduct. For companies, investors, creditors, lawyers, and individuals, finding the assets is often just as important as establishing what happened.
Assets can take many forms. They may include real estate, vehicles, bank funds, shares in companies, corporate rights, business interests, securities, intellectual property, valuable movable property, or assets held through related companies and nominees. Ukrainian legislation also recognizes a broad range of property and property rights within the concept of assets that may become subject to seizure or other legal measures.
A professional asset recovery investigation combines corporate research, financial intelligence, open-source research, document analysis, asset tracing, and the reconstruction of ownership and business relationships.
Asset recovery investigation is the process of identifying assets, determining who controls them, establishing their location, and documenting connections between assets, individuals, and companies.
In Ukraine, the terms “asset finding” and “asset tracing” have specific legal meanings. Asset finding concerns establishing that an asset exists, while asset tracing concerns determining where the asset is located. ARMA — the Asset Recovery and Management Agency — performs these functions within its statutory powers, including upon requests from investigators, detectives, pre-trial investigation authorities, prosecutors, and courts.
A private investigation can complement this process by researching information available from lawful public and commercial sources, analyzing corporate relationships, identifying potential assets, and preparing structured intelligence for the client and legal counsel.
Recovering money or property can become difficult when assets have been transferred, sold, hidden behind companies, registered in the name of another person, or moved to another jurisdiction.
A debtor may have no obvious property registered in their own name while still controlling a profitable company, commercial property, vehicles, shares, or other valuable assets through connected individuals or corporate structures.
This is why an asset recovery investigation normally looks beyond the name of the person or company involved.
The objective is not simply to find an apartment or bank account. The objective is to understand the wider asset structure and determine how different assets may be connected to the subject.
An asset tracing investigation may examine several categories of property and ownership.
Real Estate
Real estate can include residential property, commercial premises, land, warehouses, industrial facilities, and other registered interests.
Investigators may examine available records and corporate information to identify potential property ownership, changes in ownership, associated companies, and connections between property and individuals.
Where ownership has changed, the investigation can focus on the circumstances and timing of the transfer and whether the transaction appears connected to the underlying dispute or investigation.
Companies and Corporate Assets
Corporate structures are frequently important in asset recovery cases.
An individual may not personally own a valuable asset but may control a company that owns property, vehicles, intellectual property, shares, or other business interests.
Corporate research can therefore examine directors, shareholders, beneficial ownership information where available, affiliated companies, former business partners, addresses, related entities, and other connections.
The purpose is to reconstruct the corporate network rather than examine a company in isolation.
Bank and Financial Interests
Financial assets can be more difficult to identify because investigators generally cannot access confidential banking information without appropriate legal authority.
A private investigator should therefore distinguish between identifying indicators of financial activity and obtaining protected banking information.
Open-source research can sometimes reveal companies, transactions, business relationships, public financial information, litigation, insolvency proceedings, or other indicators that help lawyers determine what formal legal steps may be appropriate.
One of the most challenging aspects of asset recovery is identifying assets that have been transferred to another person or company.
Investigators may examine:
relatives and business associates;
companies with common directors or addresses;
historical corporate relationships;
transfers of shares or corporate rights;
changes in ownership;
related businesses;
property transactions;
unusual corporate restructurings;
connections between apparently independent companies.
The investigation does not automatically establish that a transfer was unlawful. Instead, it can identify facts and relationships that require further legal assessment.
Asset recovery is often connected with fraud investigations.
For example, a company may suffer financial losses because of fraudulent invoices, unauthorized payments, procurement manipulation, employee misconduct, or the diversion of company assets.
The investigation can follow the movement from the original loss to the businesses, individuals, or assets potentially connected with the transaction.
This can help create an evidence-based timeline showing:
loss → transaction → recipient → company or individual → asset → ownership or control.
Such a structure can be particularly useful for lawyers preparing civil claims, criminal complaints, enforcement strategies, or requests to competent authorities.
Asset tracing is not limited to criminal investigations.
Companies and individuals may need asset research in connection with unpaid debts, contractual disputes, shareholder conflicts, insolvency, fraud involving business partners, or enforcement of court judgments.
Before investing significant resources into litigation or enforcement, a creditor may want to understand whether the debtor appears to have recoverable assets.
An investigation may therefore help answer a practical question:
Is there identifiable property against which a legal recovery strategy could potentially be pursued?
The investigation itself does not replace court enforcement. Instead, it can provide information that helps legal professionals determine where to focus their efforts.
Modern asset recovery frequently crosses national borders.
A Ukrainian company or individual may have business connections, property, corporate interests, or other assets outside Ukraine. Conversely, foreign creditors and companies may need to investigate assets located in Ukraine.
International tracing can involve corporate research, property information, commercial databases, litigation records, sanctions information, and cooperation with professionals in other jurisdictions.
Ukraine's institutional asset recovery system also operates internationally. ARMA cooperates with foreign authorities and international networks, including CARIN, INTERPOL, and EUROPOL, for asset-finding and tracing activities.
According to ARMA, Ukraine sent hundreds of international asset-tracing requests in 2025, reflecting the growing importance of cross-border asset recovery.
A private investigator can assist with the intelligence-gathering stage of an asset recovery strategy.
Depending on the case, services may include:
asset identification;
corporate ownership research;
company network analysis;
beneficial ownership research using lawful sources;
property and business-interest research;
background investigations;
connection analysis;
open-source financial research;
investigation of suspected asset transfers;
international research through lawful sources;
preparation of investigative reports.
The investigator should work within applicable Ukrainian law and should not present confidential banking, tax, or government information as if it were freely obtainable.
Finding an asset is only one stage of recovery.
In criminal proceedings, Ukrainian law provides mechanisms for the seizure of property in circumstances established by the Criminal Procedure Code. Property may be subject to seizure for purposes including preservation of evidence, special confiscation, confiscation, or securing compensation for damage caused by a criminal offense.
ARMA's role is different from that of a private investigator. ARMA is a state authority with statutory powers concerning the finding, tracing, and management of assets in relevant proceedings. Its activities are governed by Ukrainian legislation, including the Law of Ukraine on ARMA, which was current in an amended version as of January 30, 2026.
Therefore, a private asset recovery investigation should be viewed as an investigative and intelligence-support service rather than a substitute for court proceedings, enforcement authorities, prosecutors, or ARMA.
An investigation may be appropriate when:
a debtor appears to have hidden or transferred assets;
a business has suffered financial losses;
a commercial partner is suspected of fraud;
a company wants to investigate missing corporate assets;
a creditor needs information before pursuing enforcement;
a foreign company needs to identify assets in Ukraine;
property appears to have been transferred through connected companies;
there are concerns about nominee ownership or undisclosed business interests.
Early investigation can be particularly useful because asset structures may change over time.
Asset Recovery Investigations in Ukraine require more than simply searching for property registered under a person's name. Effective asset tracing involves understanding corporate structures, ownership relationships, transactions, business connections, property interests, and the movement of assets.
For international clients, creditors, companies, and legal professionals, a structured investigation can provide valuable intelligence for developing an appropriate recovery strategy.
Ukraine has an established institutional framework for asset finding, tracing, seizure, management, and recovery, including the work of ARMA and the mechanisms provided by Ukrainian procedural law.
A private investigator can complement this framework by conducting lawful research, connecting fragmented information, identifying potential assets and relationships, and preparing clear investigative findings for further legal action.
The most effective approach is usually a coordinated one: investigation identifies the assets, legal professionals determine the appropriate legal strategy, and competent authorities or courts apply the measures available under Ukrainian law.
Tell us about your situation. Our investigators will review your case, explain your options, and recommend the most appropriate investigative approach.
Request a Confidential Case Review
